[31052] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: When IPv6 ... if ever?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (batz)
Thu Sep 7 14:06:00 2000
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2000 09:20:06 -0400 (EDT)
From: batz <batsy@vapour.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0009071105010.10675-100000@advsol4.dsl.concentric.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009070917490.32867-100000@intrepid.vapour.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000, Dana Hudes wrote:
:NAT is more than just a means to ease IP address space use.
:The use of a dynamic NAT pool allows the hiding of internal IP
:topology, thereby increasing security.
My questions took for granted that v6 does both. I was just wondering
if there has been a comparison done, or there were published
studies of one as a substitute for the other.
--
batz
Chief Reverse Engineer
Superficial Intelligence Research
Defective Technologies
