[28004] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Vijay Gill)
Tue Apr 4 15:39:32 2000
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 15:34:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vijay Gill <wrath@cs.umbc.edu>
To: "Henry R. Linneweh" <linneweh@concentric.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0004041304210.1284-100000@matterhorn.nielsen.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.95.1000404153147.27059G-100000@mailserver-ng.cs.umbc.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Henry R. Linneweh wrote:
> I would consider this an outage of sorts, setting the political rhetoric
> aside, it served everyone well to be informed so they can reroute
> and adjust their networks with exodus now so that there will be
> minimal disruption of traffic.
hmm, lets try this
route-server.exodus.net>show ip route 38.0.0.0 255.0.0.0
Routing entry for 38.0.0.0/8
Known via "bgp 3967", distance 200, metric 0
Tag 1239, type internal
Last update from 209.1.220.41 15:48:45 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
* 209.1.220.41, from 209.1.220.41, 15:48:45 ago
Route metric is 0, traffic share count is 1
AS Hops 2, BGP network version 8111131
route-server.exodus.net>
exodus still appears to be seeing psinet blocks.
/vijay
