[28005] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Gordon Cook)
Tue Apr 4 16:04:16 2000
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <v04210110b50ff54b3de1@[38.26.139.166]>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.GSO.4.21.0004041308400.1284-100000@matterhorn.nielsen.net>
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 15:41:05 -0400
To: Christian Nielsen <cnielsen@nielsen.net>
From: Gordon Cook <cook@cookreport.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
I am sorry Christian but if you cared enough to read the message to
which you are posting you would see that I am not taking part in this
conversation
>On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Fletcher E Kittredge wrote:
>
> > Golly Paul, I would not have guessed you would have taken this
> > position.
> >
> > If a tobacco company marks a collusion document "CONFIDENTIAL", should
> > the press not report it?
> >
> > If a Waco report is market "Top Secret", should the press not report
> > it?
> >
> > If Boeing has a flawed design, should the press not report it?
> >
> > There is a fair amount of evidence that an unruly and discourteous
> > press is a profound good for society....
>
>I am sorry gordon, i have a hard time seeing how something killing people is
>the same as peering.
>
>Christian
****************************************************************
The COOK Report on Internet Index to 8 years of the COOK Report
431 Greenway Ave, Ewing, NJ 08618 USA http://cookreport.com
(609) 882-2572 (phone & fax) Battle for Cyberspace: How
cook@cookreport.com Crucial Technical . . . - 392 pages
just published. See http://cookreport.com/ipbattle.shtml
****************************************************************
