[28003] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christian Nielsen)
Tue Apr 4 15:34:14 2000
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2000 13:31:17 -0600 (MDT)
From: Christian Nielsen <cnielsen@nielsen.net>
To: Gordon Cook <cook@cookreport.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200004041827.e34IRpL06934@sss1.gwi.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0004041308400.1284-100000@matterhorn.nielsen.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Tue, 4 Apr 2000, Fletcher E Kittredge wrote:
> Golly Paul, I would not have guessed you would have taken this
> position.
>
> If a tobacco company marks a collusion document "CONFIDENTIAL", should
> the press not report it?
>
> If a Waco report is market "Top Secret", should the press not report
> it?
>
> If Boeing has a flawed design, should the press not report it?
>
> There is a fair amount of evidence that an unruly and discourteous
> press is a profound good for society....
I am sorry gordon, i have a hard time seeing how something killing people is
the same as peering.
Christian
