[27972] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Rubenstein)
Mon Apr 3 22:14:59 2000
Date: Mon, 3 Apr 2000 22:15:06 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
To: Paul Ferguson <ferguson@cisco.com>
Cc: Gordon Cook <cook@cookreport.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20000403220759.00a79c20@lint.cisco.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.05.10004032214380.2104-100000@shakalaka>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> At 10:06 PM 04/03/2000 -0400, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
>
> >Because one party -- the originator -- marks an electronic communique as a
> >confidential communication, does that really require the reciever to keep
> >it confidential?
>
> Professional courtesy.
Hmm, I forgot to put the sentence in about 'how it would be ethical for
people to honor it.'...
>
> - paul
>
>
