[27973] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Mon Apr 3 22:24:00 2000
Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20000403221746.00a71540@lint.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 22:20:17 -0400
To: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson@cisco.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.05.10004032214380.2104-100000@shakalaka>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 10:15 PM 04/03/2000 -0400, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
> > >Because one party -- the originator -- marks an electronic communique as a
> > >confidential communication, does that really require the reciever to keep
> > >it confidential?
> >
> > Professional courtesy.
>
>Hmm, I forgot to put the sentence in about 'how it would be ethical for
>people to honor it.'...
Fortunately, there are still quite a few folks who still honor
professional & personal ethics. Unfortunately, there are many
who do not.
- paul
