[27971] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: peering wars revisited? PSI vs Exodus
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Ferguson)
Mon Apr 3 22:11:30 2000
Message-Id: <4.3.1.2.20000403220759.00a79c20@lint.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2000 22:08:22 -0400
To: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
From: Paul Ferguson <ferguson@cisco.com>
Cc: Gordon Cook <cook@cookreport.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.05.10004032204200.2104-100000@shakalaka>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
At 10:06 PM 04/03/2000 -0400, Alex Rubenstein wrote:
>Because one party -- the originator -- marks an electronic communique as a
>confidential communication, does that really require the reciever to keep
>it confidential?
Professional courtesy.
- paul
