[26119] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Net 24 (was Re: Verio Decides what parts of the internet to drop)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Sun Dec 5 11:55:25 1999
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
Message-Id: <199912051723.JAA04633@vacation.karoshi.com>
To: sean@donelan.com (Sean Donelan)
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 09:23:08 -0800 (PST)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <19991205160724.885.cpmta@c004.sfo.cp.net> from "Sean Donelan" at Dec 05, 1999 08:07:24 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> > Instead, we are looking at a routing system where some traffic will flow on
> > some networks if it is a longer subnet of a class B address, and will not
> > flow on some networks based on arbitrary filter decisions. Some kind of RFC
> > based consistency would be great.
>
> I've always wondered, where is the RFC for network 24?
There shouldn't be one. RFC's are ostensibly protocol
spec's. There are some documents that describe operational
realities and suggestions but when this idea came up
a few years back, there was serious concern raised
about collusion and restraint of trade.
--bill
