[26117] in North American Network Operators' Group
Net 24 (was Re: Verio Decides what parts of the internet to drop)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Donelan)
Sun Dec 5 11:08:48 1999
Date: 5 Dec 1999 08:07:24 -0800
Message-ID: <19991205160724.885.cpmta@c004.sfo.cp.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Disposition: inline
Mime-Version: 1.0
To: nanog@merit.edu
From: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sun, 05 December 1999, "Travis Pugh" wrote:
> Absolutely. A standard would give ground rules, and would be something to
> point to when you have to go to a client or customer and say "these are your
> options."
>
> Instead, we are looking at a routing system where some traffic will flow on
> some networks if it is a longer subnet of a class B address, and will not
> flow on some networks based on arbitrary filter decisions. Some kind of RFC
> based consistency would be great.
I've always wondered, where is the RFC for network 24?
