[26135] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Net 24 (was Re: Verio Decides what parts of the internet to drop)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com)
Sun Dec 5 21:14:31 1999
From: bmanning@vacation.karoshi.com
Message-Id: <199912060242.SAA05049@vacation.karoshi.com>
To: brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk (BrandonButterworth)
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 18:42:09 -0800 (PST)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <29898.199912051702@sunf10.rd.bbc.co.uk> from "BrandonButterworth" at Dec 05, 1999 05:02:24 PM
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
>
>
> > > Instead, we are looking at a routing system where some traffic will flow on
> > > some networks if it is a longer subnet of a class B address, and will not
> > > flow on some networks based on arbitrary filter decisions. Some kind of RFC
> > > based consistency would be great.
> ...
> > when this idea came up
> > a few years back, there was serious concern raised
> > about collusion and restraint of trade.
>
> And selective routability isn't?
>
> brandon
>
selective routability based on each ISP's internal policies is
one thing, an RFC that specifies how all ISPs should behave is a
bit different.
--bill
