[22942] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Monitoring, Flow Stats (Re: spam whore, norcal-systems)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dan Hollis)
Wed Feb 3 18:26:13 1999
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 14:48:54 -0800 (PST)
From: Dan Hollis <goemon@sasami.anime.net>
To: Dean Anderson <dean@av8.com>
cc: Christopher Neill <chris@verio.net>, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>,
ravi@verio.net, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19990203172707.00c204b0@odie.av8.com>
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Dean Anderson wrote:
> I note that none of the big providers do any of this. They don't block.
> They don't monitor for more than their service quality. Other than
> canceling service if they get complaints, they don't do anything except
> perhaps refer complaints to others.
Is blocking smurfs a violation of ECPA? Some providers do indeed block
smurfs that they transit, as you say, "3 providers removed".
-Dan
