[195276] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP peering question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Hofstee)
Wed Jul 12 15:10:20 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <0ED3AF25-E50C-4303-B26D-95E6D041D7CF@de-cix.net>
From: David Hofstee <opentext.dhofstee@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 12:18:47 +0200
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I would state that peering gives more control over the traffic you handle
(since it is not going over someone else's network). Every hop is a
possible problem to your operations, I guess.
David
On 12 July 2017 at 09:13, Wolfgang Tremmel <wolfgang.tremmel@de-cix.net>
wrote:
>
> > On 11. Jul 2017, at 21:43, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> wrote:
> >
> > Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
> >> 1) Are they present an IX where I am present?
> >>
> >> 2) Can they configure BGP correctly?
> >>
> >> 3) =E2=80=A6 Beer?
> >
> >
> > 1) do they have a pulse?
>
> 4 ) are they in PeeringDB and keep their entry up to date? (especially th=
e
> contact information)
>
> cheers,
> Wolfgang
>
>
> --
> Wolfgang Tremmel
>
> Phone +49 69 1730902 26 | Fax +49 69 4056 2716 | Mobile +49 171 8600 816
> | wolfgang.tremmel@de-cix.net
> Geschaeftsfuehrer Harald A. Summa | Registergericht AG K=C3=B6ln HRB 5113=
5
> DE-CIX Management GmbH | Lindleystrasse 12 | 60314 Frankfurt am Main |
> Germany | www.de-cix.net
>
>
>
--=20
--
My opinion is mine.
