[195275] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP peering question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tore Anderson)
Wed Jul 12 14:14:02 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: craig washington <craigwashington01@hotmail.com>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
From: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 20:13:56 +0200
In-Reply-To: <SN1PR0701MB2062FF8DCB6CB931CBBAE1BDA8A90@SN1PR0701MB2062.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
* craig washington
> Newbie question, what criteria do you look for when you decide that
> you want to peer with someone or if you will accept peering with
> someone from an ISP point of view.
Routing hygiene. I expect the would-be peer to keep the number of
advertised routes that are either 1) not registered in RIPE/RADB, 2)
disaggregated, or 3) redundant (i.e., more-specifics of larger
advertisements) to an absolute minimum.
Tore
