[195304] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: BGP peering question
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Opeyemi via NANOG)
Fri Jul 14 12:58:58 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <SN1PR0701MB2062FF8DCB6CB931CBBAE1BDA8A90@SN1PR0701MB2062.namprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2017 14:18:10 -0400
To: craig washington <craigwashington01@hotmail.com>
From: Opeyemi via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: Opeyemi <opeolomola@yahoo.co.uk>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Okay I will just throw this, in addition to what the others have said. =46rom=
an ISP point of view, assuming the neighbor is able to provision their end o=
f the cross-connect, you need to check the common POP cost requirements, and=
also consider if the neighbor is willing to either pay for the peering or p=
rovide a mutual benefit.
Payment is straight forward. Mutual benefit will depend on what you desire f=
rom the neighbor-ship; secure IPv6, Transit services, latency and capacity t=
hresholds, route and path attribute requirements, responsiveness to collabor=
ation over issues (abuse, outages, and instability), internetwork politics, a=
nd other BGP controls.
Opeyemi Olomola
> On Jul 10, 2017, at 4:12 PM, craig washington <craigwashington01@hotmail.c=
om> wrote:
>=20
>=20
> Newbie question, what criteria do you look for when you decide that you wa=
nt to peer with someone or if you will accept peering with someone from an I=
SP point of view.
