[195060] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (tim@pelican.org)
Tue Jun 20 09:46:55 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:46:21 +0100 (BST)
From: "tim@pelican.org" <tim@pelican.org>
To: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <583541363.462.1497966071756.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Tuesday, 20 June, 2017 14:41, "Mike Hammett" <nanog@ics-il.net> said:=0A=
=0A> I'm still not sure people understand the situation. There's an attende=
e list, but=0A> that list doesn't have e-mail addresses. It didn't come fro=
m the mailing list. The=0A> person looked up who went to the conference and=
then found their e-mail address=0A> elsewhere. I also don't think the abov=
e is wrong in any way and people should just=0A> get on with their lives.=
=0A=0AFair point, that's a lot harder to tie back to NANOG (although, of co=
urse, if you follow the scheme religiously, you *can* find out where they l=
ooked you up :) )=0A=0ARegards,=0ATim.=0A
