[195041] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Vendors spamming NANOG attendees
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (i mawsog via NANOG)
Mon Jun 19 20:50:13 2017
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 14:41:03 +0000 (UTC)
To: "rjoffe@centergate.com" <rjoffe@centergate.com>, Ge Dupin <gdupin@taho.fr>
In-Reply-To: <40B271A9-9997-4E02-B2C7-D0E95EA6B8F3@centergate.com>
From: i mawsog via NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Reply-To: "imawsog@yahoo.com" <imawsog@yahoo.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Agree, this thread has generated more "spam" or noise for all of us collect=
ively.=C2=A0
Some amount of relevant "spam" =C2=A0has to be tolerated for vendor to cont=
inue supporting NANOG. Also relevant "spam" or sales call is a good way to =
find out about new technologies , that one may not have heard about otherwi=
se. =C2=A0
Another tip, just ignore, =C2=A0the "spammer" will go away eventually. =C2=
=A0
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android=20
=20
On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 6:45 AM, Rodney Joffe<rjoffe@centergate.com> wrot=
e: I guess that explains why so many newcomers are confused about what sp=
am is.=20
> On Jun 14, 2017, at 5:33 AM, Ge Dupin <gdupin@taho.fr> wrote:
>=20
> It looks like there are more spams coming from these discussions than fro=
m the original Scams/Spams..
> Ge
>=20
>>> Le 14 juin 2017 =C3=A0 14:26, Rodney Joffe <rjoffe@centergate.com> a =
=C3=A9crit :
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> On Jun 13, 2017, at 10:28 PM, Mel Beckman <mel@beckman.org> wrote:
>>>=20
>>> But as I said, harvesting emails is not illegal under can spam. And the=
requirement to not send you UCE to harvested emails is pointless, because =
how do you prove that someone did that?
>>>=20
>> Because he said so?
>>=20
>>>>>> The spammer had the balls to say, in his email:
>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>>=20
>>>>>>> We do not know each other. I'm leveraging the attendee list for NAN=
OG to reach out and raise awareness of the value of OCS (Optical Circuit Sw=
itching) in the data center and in particular, the Carrier Neutral Hotel wh=
ere we've been active with next generation MeetMeRoom discussions.
>>=20
>>=20
> =20
