[192660] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Fri Nov 11 01:25:57 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com>, Tim Jackson <jackson.tim@gmail.com>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 07:53:28 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAC6=tfZ+70ZJyJ6ZN_tzTJBbCfniEm36jzejsEKvoaP9Szm8vg@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 11/Nov/16 02:53, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> Here's a start!
>
> "Support for OSPFv3 and IS-IS is various beta states currently; IS-IS for
> IPv4 is believed to be usable while OSPFv3 and IS-IS for IPv6 have known
> issues."
Such as?
Mark.
