[192661] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [SPAM] Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Fri Nov 11 01:40:58 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Charles van Niman <charles@phukish.com>,
Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 07:45:26 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CABD6Mzvonchv_+EYb3cQG66oK+r8EEGHFqtdfvik-3YECna3-w@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 10/Nov/16 23:53, Charles van Niman wrote:
> I don't think Nick asked for a list, just one single thing, any one
> thing. To me at least, it doesn't really make sense to make the
> statement you did, without pointing out what can be done to improve
> the situation. I would be very interested to hear what network
> requirements are not being met with Juniper's current IS-IS
> implementation.
To be honest, none that I can think of.
Many of the feature differences are vendor-specific, particularly with
how you can further optimize IS-IS to handle LSP's flooding, flushing,
re-calculation, throttling, e.t.c.
Bottom line, Juniper fully supports the IS-IS spec., from what we see.
Mark.
