[192666] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: OSPF vs ISIS - Which do you prefer & why?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mark Tinka)
Fri Nov 11 03:25:58 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com>,
Charles van Niman <charles@phukish.com>
From: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 07:52:43 +0200
In-Reply-To: <CAC6=tfZzvO3uc0Jacjb1-v_b=qa+bnHK5cF9d4uy3bFP_5feZw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 11/Nov/16 02:33, Josh Reynolds wrote:
> My first post said the following:
>
> "Vendor support for IS-IS is quite limited - many options for OSPF."
Again, the only one I know that struggles is Quagga.
But I've not heard any reports from anyone running Brocade, Nokia (ALU),
Huawei, e.t.c. that IS-IS doesn't work or is quite limited.
I can say both Cisco and Juniper have no issues at all in this area.
Arista are young in the routing space, but I am confident their
implementations will be up to par soon (if they aren't already).
Mark.
