[189949] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: intra-AS messaging for route leak prevention
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Fri Jun 10 13:35:44 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <e13205e1-412b-fd58-cc86-0af89c2780e6@seacom.mu>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:27:34 -0400
To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>, "Sriram,
Kotikalapudi \(Fed\)" <kotikalapudi.sriram@nist.gov>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> wrote:
>
>
> On 10/Jun/16 19:08, Christopher Morrow wrote:
>
>
>
> =E2=80=8Boh, so I didn't misunderstand.. that makes 'backup isp' less use=
ful, no?=E2=80=8B
>
>
>
> With regard to reaching our network, not true. You would still be able to
> reach our network if your primary service with us failed, but not via a
> local peer.
>
>
=E2=80=8BI'm clearly misunderstanding something.
I suppose if it works for your customers it must be ok.=E2=80=8B
