[189948] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Equinix IX Port Moves
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher Morrow)
Fri Jun 10 13:32:39 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <2013715251.1814.1465579127061.JavaMail.mhammett@ThunderFuck>
From: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:26:51 -0400
To: Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net> wrote:
> The second option.
>
> Well, there is the first under process too, but the second is the priorit=
y
> at the moment.
>
>
>
=E2=80=8Bit's a little mystifying that they can't arrange a 'hot cut' of th=
e link
then between the 2 locations.
They were able to do this for an org I don't work for but help out... for 2
links in a cage->cage move event just a little less than a year ago
actually.=E2=80=8B
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> Midwest-IX
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
> To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog@ics-il.net>
> Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>
> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 9:46:17 AM
> Subject: Re: Equinix IX Port Moves
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Mike Hammett < nanog@ics-il.net > wrote=
:
>
>
> Who has moved an Equinix IX port? We're told that it's a full
> cancellation, re-order, re IPs, re-peering, etc.
>
> Can anyone lend any input either way on that?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> there are 2 meanings (at least) to 'move', did you mean:
> 1) move port from 1G to 10G (or 'change speed')
> 2) move port from cage/rack1 to cage/rack2 (endpoint move in your space(s=
)
> )
>
>
> <blockquote>
>
>
>
> -----
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
> http://www.ics-il.com
>
> Midwest-IX
> http://www.midwest-ix.com
>
> </blockquote>
>
>
>
