[189945] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Equinix IX Port Moves
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mike Hammett)
Fri Jun 10 13:23:39 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:18:47 -0500 (CDT)
From: Mike Hammett <nanog@ics-il.net>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLaaAeyDRT6-QdnvPrjDCNONR5bEJxozQ2SV3kwWOutEn0Q@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
The second option.
Well, there is the first under process too, but the second is the priority at the moment.
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Christopher Morrow" <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
To: "Mike Hammett" <nanog@ics-il.net>
Cc: "NANOG" <nanog@nanog.org>
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 9:46:17 AM
Subject: Re: Equinix IX Port Moves
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 10:00 AM, Mike Hammett < nanog@ics-il.net > wrote:
Who has moved an Equinix IX port? We're told that it's a full cancellation, re-order, re IPs, re-peering, etc.
Can anyone lend any input either way on that?
there are 2 meanings (at least) to 'move', did you mean:
1) move port from 1G to 10G (or 'change speed')
2) move port from cage/rack1 to cage/rack2 (endpoint move in your space(s) )
<blockquote>
-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
</blockquote>
