[187541] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Bass)
Sat Feb 6 16:38:58 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: David Bass <davidbass570@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC6=tfa0QuinWV7E2FQCLmweXMG5CbN7Ad80ubcZnmR1bh_7LQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 16:38:51 -0500
To: Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com>
Cc: Cameron Ferdinands <cameron@jferdinands.com>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Yeah, on the list...well the 4600 is since it's somewhat the replacement to t=
he 4500/4550.=20
> On Feb 6, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
>=20
> Why not consider an EX4500?
>=20
>> On Feb 6, 2016 12:24 PM, "Cameron Ferdinands" <cameron@jferdinands.com> w=
rote:
>> If you need high-er density 10GE. Consider an Juniper ACX5048.
>>=20
>> Great edge box, MPLS features, it's essentially just a QFX with
>> repartitioned CAM / some tricks to get the most out of the Trident II
>> chipset.
>>=20
>> Won't do a bunch of things, so make sure it's exactly what you need or
>> you'll burn yourself YMMV.
>>=20
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:50 AM Dan Spataro <dspataro@corp.nac.net> wrote:=
>>=20
>> > Depending on your interpretation of full MPLS stack, you can look into t=
he
>> > Brocade CES.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of David Bass
>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 4:04 PM
>> > To: nanog@nanog.org
>> > Subject: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
>> >
>> > Looking to see what others are using out there as an alternative to a
>> > Cisco ME3600X? Also, what other vendors out there are playing in this s=
pace?
>> >
>> > Need a full MPLS stack.
>> >
