[187542] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Josh Reynolds)
Sat Feb 6 16:42:16 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <87D4D4CF-59C7-48CB-AFC3-3BEADB53C8CF@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 15:41:50 -0600
From: Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com>
To: David Bass <davidbass570@gmail.com>
Cc: Cameron Ferdinands <cameron@jferdinands.com>,
"nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Newer, more expensive, more bugs. 4500 is cheap on the secondary market.
On Feb 6, 2016 3:38 PM, "David Bass" <davidbass570@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah, on the list...well the 4600 is since it's somewhat the replacement
> to the 4500/4550.
>
> On Feb 6, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:
>
> Why not consider an EX4500?
> On Feb 6, 2016 12:24 PM, "Cameron Ferdinands" <cameron@jferdinands.com>
> wrote:
>
>> If you need high-er density 10GE. Consider an Juniper ACX5048.
>>
>> Great edge box, MPLS features, it's essentially just a QFX with
>> repartitioned CAM / some tricks to get the most out of the Trident II
>> chipset.
>>
>> Won't do a bunch of things, so make sure it's exactly what you need or
>> you'll burn yourself YMMV.
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:50 AM Dan Spataro <dspataro@corp.nac.net> wrote:
>>
>> > Depending on your interpretation of full MPLS stack, you can look into
>> the
>> > Brocade CES.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of David Bass
>> > Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 4:04 PM
>> > To: nanog@nanog.org
>> > Subject: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
>> >
>> > Looking to see what others are using out there as an alternative to a
>> > Cisco ME3600X? Also, what other vendors out there are playing in this
>> space?
>> >
>> > Need a full MPLS stack.
>> >
>>
>
