[187540] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Josh Reynolds)
Sat Feb 6 13:55:05 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAFXuDfaEN1CBDES80631j-+3-SXVV2BScNEUjUe=s2mQ6taOqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 12:55:01 -0600
From: Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com>
To: Cameron Ferdinands <cameron@jferdinands.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Why not consider an EX4500?
On Feb 6, 2016 12:24 PM, "Cameron Ferdinands" <cameron@jferdinands.com>
wrote:
> If you need high-er density 10GE. Consider an Juniper ACX5048.
>
> Great edge box, MPLS features, it's essentially just a QFX with
> repartitioned CAM / some tricks to get the most out of the Trident II
> chipset.
>
> Won't do a bunch of things, so make sure it's exactly what you need or
> you'll burn yourself YMMV.
>
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:50 AM Dan Spataro <dspataro@corp.nac.net> wrote:
>
> > Depending on your interpretation of full MPLS stack, you can look into
> the
> > Brocade CES.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-bounces@nanog.org] On Behalf Of David Bass
> > Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 4:04 PM
> > To: nanog@nanog.org
> > Subject: Low density Juniper (or alternative) Edge
> >
> > Looking to see what others are using out there as an alternative to a
> > Cisco ME3600X? Also, what other vendors out there are playing in this
> space?
> >
> > Need a full MPLS stack.
> >
>
