[187350] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (=?utf-8?B?TcOlbnM=?= Nilsson)
Wed Jan 27 17:43:25 2016
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 23:43:20 +0100
From: =?utf-8?B?TcOlbnM=?= Nilsson <mansaxel@besserwisser.org>
To: Brandon Butterworth <brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <201601221228.MAA12225@sunf10.rd.bbc.co.uk>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--nHwqXXcoX0o6fKCv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane E=
lectric - and how to solve it Date: Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:28:01PM +0000 Q=
uoting Brandon Butterworth (brandon@rd.bbc.co.uk):
=20
> tier 1 seems consistent with Cogents refusal.
one does not become a tier 1 by refusing to peer. an actual tier 1 will
of course most of the time refuse settlement-free interconnection with
smaller actors to protect their revenue stream, but the traffic volumes
and short settlement-free paths to large parts of the Internet are what
make them a tier-1.
do you hear me, medium-sized swedish isp full of clued people but with
a serious case of peering reality distorsion?
--=20
M=C3=A5ns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina
MN-1334-RIPE +46 705 989668
Can you MAIL a BEAN CAKE?
--nHwqXXcoX0o6fKCv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iEYEARECAAYFAlapSAcACgkQ02/pMZDM1cUlyACgkaTghfQw7r1swDvcgUHIfQHv
dmsAnin2jVyYIV59ZWBlfa3tA9sDPg8i
=5703
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nHwqXXcoX0o6fKCv--
