[186618] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: de-peering for security sake

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Mikael Abrahamsson)
Fri Dec 25 16:52:16 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 22:52:12 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Colin Johnston <colinj@gt86car.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <1E957E27-F8A0-450C-9A51-F497B2EC4155@gt86car.org.uk>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

On Fri, 25 Dec 2015, Colin Johnston wrote:

> why do the chinese network folks never reply and action abuse reports, 
> normal slow speed network abuse is tolerated, but not high speed 
> deliberate abuse albeit compromised machines

This is not a chinese problem, this is a general ISP problem. Most ISPs do 
not respond to abuse reports.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post