[186619] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: de-peering for security sake
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Clayton Zekelman)
Fri Dec 25 17:12:14 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Clayton Zekelman <clayton@mnsi.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1512252250480.29581@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 17:12:04 -0500
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Just an off the cuff thought but if the format of the abuse messages could b=
e standardized so handling them would be semi-automated somewhat like ACNS n=
otices, it might improve response.
Maybe such a format already exists and just isn't widely used.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 25, 2015, at 4:52 PM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
>=20
>> On Fri, 25 Dec 2015, Colin Johnston wrote:
>>=20
>> why do the chinese network folks never reply and action abuse reports, no=
rmal slow speed network abuse is tolerated, but not high speed deliberate ab=
use albeit compromised machines
>=20
> This is not a chinese problem, this is a general ISP problem. Most ISPs do=
not respond to abuse reports.
>=20
> --=20
> Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
