[186617] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: de-peering for security sake
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Fri Dec 25 15:50:36 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <F2D23224-B892-4055-B455-ADFFFF75DD8B@gt86car.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 12:49:37 -0800
To: Colin Johnston <colinj@gt86car.org.uk>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I think that even in the US, a provider would want a more specific =
complaint than =E2=80=9CThe network abuses=E2=80=9D.
Owen
> On Dec 25, 2015, at 12:40 , Colin Johnston <colinj@gt86car.org.uk> =
wrote:
>=20
> been there, done that
> =E7=BD=91=E7=BB=9C=E6=BB=A5=E7=94=A8 fix you ntp reflection servers :)
>=20
> Sent from my iPhone
>=20
>> On 25 Dec 2015, at 20:29, Baldur Norddahl <baldur.norddahl@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>>=20
>>> On 25 December 2015 at 21:10, Colin Johnston <colinj@gt86car.org.uk> =
wrote:
>>>=20
>>> why do the chinese network folks never reply and action abuse =
reports,
>>> normal slow speed network abuse is tolerated, but not high speed =
deliberate
>>> abuse albeit compromised machine
>>=20
>> They do not speak the same language as you. They barely understand =
your
>> complaint and you would not understand their reply (in chinese!) - or =
do
>> you expect everyone to know english?
>>=20
>> Why does everyone expect the chinese to use Google Translate? Try it
>> yourself before sending off your complaint in Mandarin...
>>=20
>> Regards,
>>=20
>> Baldur
