[186424] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Nat

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Thu Dec 17 02:08:00 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 16:07:49 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Charles Monson <charles.lists@camonson.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAbPayKVqf7r=77Jjks8WJOgm5eqFpD4OqUyTopKBPa2TRvQNA@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

> It seems like NAT would be another way to make IPv4 more painful to
> use.

it is.  but, judging by people's actions, in many cases it seems less
painful than going to ipv6.  off-pissing, but reality.

randy

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post