[186432] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Nat
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ahmed Munaf)
Thu Dec 17 12:30:42 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Ahmed Munaf <ahmed.dalaali@hrins.net>
In-Reply-To: <567196B8.9020508@seacom.mu>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2015 20:30:32 +0300
To: Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Dec 16, 2015, at 7:52 PM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka@seacom.mu> wrote:
>=20
>=20
>=20
> On 16/Dec/15 18:36, Ahmed Munaf wrote:
>=20
>> In addition to the limited concurrent sessions for ASR1000, we are
>> facing some issue with many users how are playing online games! Nat
>> problems!
>=20
> This could be a function of the size of your ESP.
>=20
> The 5Gbps ESP can handle 256,000 NAT sessions, while the 200Gbps ESP
> will do 4,000,000 NAT sessions with a per-second setup rate of 300,000
> sessions.
>=20
> Of course, it makes little sense to upgrade if you run out of sessions
> before you hit the NAT throughput ceiling, so other vendors may be =
more
> commercially palatable.
>=20
> Mark.
Thats right but as you mentioned that its commercially palatable, =
however I don=E2=80=99t know if the other vendors are the same =
performance as ASR1000! this was my question if someone recommend =
another vendor.=20
