[186423] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Nat
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Josh Reynolds)
Wed Dec 16 21:44:07 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20151217023409.69DFB2C061A@mail.nanog.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 20:44:03 -0600
From: Josh Reynolds <josh@kyneticwifi.com>
To: Berry Mobley <berry@gadsdenst.org>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Publicly shame them by listing the ones who don't fully support IPv6. List
them here, so we know to choose their competition.
On Dec 16, 2015 8:39 PM, "Berry Mobley" <berry@gadsdenst.org> wrote:
> At 08:22 PM 12/16/2015, Randy Bush wrote:
>
>> > We need to put some pain onto everyone that is IPv4 only.
>>
>> this is the oppress the workers so they will revolt theory. load of
>> crap.
>>
>> make ipv6 easier to deploy, especially in enterprise. repeat the
>> previous sentence 42 times.
>>
>
> This. I'm in an enterprise with some stubborn vendors, and none of them
> are even talking about ipv6. It won't help me to move (and it won't help
> you to get well if you're here) if my users can't get to their stuff.
>
> Berry
>
