[184647] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Irony.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Yucong Sun)
Tue Oct 13 11:54:27 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <561CE6FB.3050704@winterei.se>
From: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:53:54 +0800
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I don't understand the strategy here, how is that getting more traffic
going-through IPv6 help its adoption by the mass? IMHO it only helps
high-end, backbone type of network equipment producers sell more of
their big box with advanced IPv6 license. It has absolutely no help
with the long tail crowd, which really need more push and incentive to
support ipv6.
Cheers.
