[184649] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Irony.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ca By)
Tue Oct 13 12:18:51 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <CAJygYd2x0HVR-QqK=MDfBwxux5FkxmnbBT59z+RqxC02xMEK+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:18:46 -0700
From: Ca By <cb.list6@gmail.com>
To: Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Yucong Sun <sunyucong@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't understand the strategy here, how is that getting more traffic
> going-through IPv6 help its adoption by the mass? IMHO it only helps
> high-end, backbone type of network equipment producers sell more of
> their big box with advanced IPv6 license. It has absolutely no help
> with the long tail crowd, which really need more push and incentive to
> support ipv6.
>
> Cheers.
>
Which "big box" has an "advanced IPv6 license"?
CB
