[184640] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 Irony.
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul S.)
Tue Oct 13 07:12:12 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: "Paul S." <contact@winterei.se>
Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 20:11:55 +0900
In-Reply-To: <561CD563.3070707@netassist.ua>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Anyone in a network administrator position struggling with IPv6 (and not
willing to fix that out of their own initiative) has no business running
any network.
You should hire better staff.
On 10/13/2015 06:56 PM, Max Tulyev wrote:
> On our network, we had to spent times more money in people than in hardware.
>
> Customer support, especially network troubleshootings and so on...
>
> So upgrade hardware and network admins are NOT sufficient for IPv6
> adoption ;)
>
> On 13.10.15 06:17, Ca By wrote:
>> On Monday, October 12, 2015, Donn Lasher <D.Lasher@f5.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Having just returned from NANOG65/ARIN36, and hearing about how far IPv6
>>> has come.. I find my experience with <large US-based ISP> support today
>>> Ironic.
>>>
>>> Oh wait..
>>>
>>> Hi, my name is Donn, and I’m speaking for… myself.
>>>
>>> Irony is a cable provider, one of the largest, and earliest adopters of
>>> IPv6, having ZERO IPv6 support available via phone, chat, or email. And
>>> being pointed, by all of those contact methods, to a single website. A
>>> static website. In 2015, when IPv4 is officially exhausted.
>>>
>>> :sigh:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> Tech support websites are long tail
>>
>> Pragmatists are focused on getting ipv6 to the masses by default in
>> high traffic use cases.
>>
>> Sighing about edge cases in the long tail with ipv6 ... Not sure what you
>> expect.
>>
>> <deleted comments about f5 not supporting standard ndp, which has caused me
>> outtages>
>>
>> CB
>>
