[184606] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: IP-Echelon Compliance

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Sean Donelan)
Fri Oct 9 17:37:03 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 17:35:58 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sean Donelan <sean@donelan.com>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLabp83XEwFE0SSx9KVOaVb78j_=5chtgOsCnSeC3hE1SiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

On Fri, 9 Oct 2015, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> fairly certian that nothing ip-echelon sends is ever valid...
> or there's enough 'clearly you are joking' mail from them that anyone
> who ends up in court for 'ip echelon violations' could simply subpeona
> their isp for 'other complaints from ip echelon' and show the judge:
> "Clearly these folk are on the good crack, case closed due to
> reasonable doubt."

procmailrc is your friend.  however far your lawyer lets you go.


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post