[184604] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP-Echelon Compliance
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Theodore Baschak)
Fri Oct 9 16:55:47 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Theodore Baschak <theodore@ciscodude.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAL9jLabp83XEwFE0SSx9KVOaVb78j_=5chtgOsCnSeC3hE1SiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 15:52:54 -0500
To: Christopher Morrow <morrowc.lists@gmail.com>
Cc: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> On Oct 9, 2015, at 3:19 PM, Christopher Morrow =
<morrowc.lists@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> fairly certian that nothing ip-echelon sends is ever valid...
> or there's enough 'clearly you are joking' mail from them that anyone
> who ends up in court for 'ip echelon violations' could simply subpeona
> their isp for 'other complaints from ip echelon' and show the judge:
> "Clearly these folk are on the good crack, case closed due to
> reasonable doubt."
Are these the jokers that send out PGP signed antipiracy notices, but =
don't have that key available anywhere on the internet (keyserver, =
webpage, etc) to validate the authenticity of their signed messages?
