[183083] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Fabien Delmotte)
Wed Aug 12 11:42:45 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Fabien Delmotte <fdelmotte1@mac.com>
In-reply-to: <CAOLsBOuQP1m8u=1H_nre9jaExONfJ16rs0h=O4m7_+Gt5q9d7g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:42:37 +0200
To: Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihashish@gmail.com>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Hello
My 2 cents
You can use Wanguard for the detection and A10 for the mitigation, you =
have just to play with the API.
Regards
Fabien
> Le 12 ao=C3=BBt 2015 =C3=A0 16:28, Ramy Hashish =
<ramy.ihashish@gmail.com> a =C3=A9crit :
>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:14:54 +0200
>> From: "marcel.duregards@yahoo.fr" <marcel.duregards@yahoo.fr>
>> To: nanog@nanog.org
>> Subject: Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions
>> Message-ID: <55C992DE.3020906@yahoo.fr>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dwindows-1252; format=3Dflowed
>>=20
>> anybody from this impressive list ?:
>>=20
>> https://www.andrisoft.com/company/customers
>>=20
>> -- Marcel
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
> Anybody here compared Wanguard's performance with the DDoS vendors in =
the
> market (Arbor, Radware, NSFocus, A10, RioRey, Staminus, F5 ......)?
>=20
> Another question, have anybody from the reviewers tested the false
> positives of the box, or experienced any false positive incidents?
>=20
> Thanks,
>=20
> Ramy
