[183079] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Ramy Hashish)
Wed Aug 12 10:28:56 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 17:28:47 +0300
From: Ramy Hashish <ramy.ihashish@gmail.com>
To: nanog@nanog.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu,
nick.pratley@serversaustralia.com.au, mtaylor@mty.net.au
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
>
>
> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 08:14:54 +0200
> From: "marcel.duregards@yahoo.fr" <marcel.duregards@yahoo.fr>
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions
> Message-ID: <55C992DE.3020906@yahoo.fr>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
>
> anybody from this impressive list ?:
>
> https://www.andrisoft.com/company/customers
>
> -- Marcel
>
>
>
Anybody here compared Wanguard's performance with the DDoS vendors in the
market (Arbor, Radware, NSFocus, A10, RioRey, Staminus, F5 ......)?
Another question, have anybody from the reviewers tested the false
positives of the box, or experienced any false positive incidents?
Thanks,
Ramy
