[183070] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Experience on Wanguard for 'anti' DDOS solutions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Taylor)
Tue Aug 11 23:26:40 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Matt Taylor <mtaylor@mty.net.au>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 13:26:17 +1000
In-Reply-To: <55CA17CB.6020308@wholesaleinternet.net>
X-Report-Abuse-To: spam@vmse01.mailcluster.com.au
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
I have not experienced any problems with multiple source attacks at the
same time. This is also including with multiple destinations too.
I guess it really depends on what you expect the product to do, and how
you write integration too.
Regards,
Matt.
On 12/08/2015 01:42, Aaron wrote:
> We tested it a while back and found that it was fine for single source
> attacks but fell over with multiple sources. Has that changed?
>
>
>
> On 8/11/2015 9:42 AM, Nick Rose wrote:
>> We have processed just under a million anomalies with this software,
>> we use the Chelsio cards for filtering. We had some troubles with
>> packet loss on the filter side until we started using those which were
>> a new feature in the latest release.
>>
>> If you have any questions I would be happy to answer them.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Nick Rose | CTO
>> Enzu Inc
>> nick.rose@enzu.com
>> www.enzu.com <http://www.enzu.com/>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/11/15, 2:14 AM, "NANOG on behalf of marcel.duregards@yahoo.fr"
>> <nanog-bounces@nanog.org on behalf of marcel.duregards@yahoo.fr> wrote:
>>
>>> anybody from this impressive list ?:
>>>
>>> https://www.andrisoft.com/company/customers
>>>
>>> -- Marcel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11.08.2015 03:28, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA256
>>>>
>>>> On 8/10/2015 6:07 PM, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 09:36:07 +1000, Nick Pratley said:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Once setup correctly. very good product - it's been running for 8
>>>>>> months now and hasn't had any issues. It's been very reliable.
>>>>> I'll bite - (roughly) how many times has it triggered and mitigated
>>>>> an actual DDoS during those 8 months? We probably draw different
>>>>> conclusions from "8 months and 1 DDoS" reliable and "8 months of
>>>>> 5-a-week" reliable...
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think that would definitely depend on how the network is base-lined.
>>>>
>>>> That is sometimes more of an art than a science. :-)
>>>>
>>>> - - ferg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - --
>>>> Paul Ferguson
>>>> PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2
>>>> Key fingerprint: 19EC 2945 FEE8 D6C8 58A1 CE53 2896 AC75 54DC 85B2
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>> Version: GnuPG v2
>>>>
>>>> iF4EAREIAAYFAlXJT7EACgkQKJasdVTchbJXoQD+Mhyy7gwtMkp+mdaEUiqvwlWe
>>>> 70mSH8n5ALmcp+qOqMoBAKo60u/ryb9IdvsclzPpoAvq+r9CtZgh+t/9YpkUIgnP
>>>> =d7d1
>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>>>>
>
