[182850] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (tqr2813d376cjozqap1l@tutanota.com)
Mon Aug 3 00:24:23 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 04:22:50 +0000 (UTC)
From: <tqr2813d376cjozqap1l@tutanota.com>
To: <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
In-Reply-To: <131048.1438575623@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
3. Aug 2015 04:20 by Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu:
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 03:58:31 -0000, tqr2813d376cjozqap1l@tutanota.com said:
>> > It seems most people colloquially use DDoS for both, and reserve DoS f=
or
>> > magic-packet blocking exploits like the latest BIND CVE, FYI.
>> Then they are mistaken, unfortunately.
>
> Feel free to try to reclaim the old meaning of the word "hacker" while
> you're at it. That ship sailed long ago, and so has the DoS/DDoS=20
> distinction.
I suppose you're right. Let the 'wordification' of=C2=A0 DDoS continue.. it=
=20
certainly isn't an acronym anymore.
