[182849] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Aug 3 00:21:01 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
To: tqr2813d376cjozqap1l@tutanota.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 03 Aug 2015 03:58:31 -0000."
<JvlhUPV----0@tutanota.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:20:23 -0400
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
--==_Exmh_1438575623_2094P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 03:58:31 -0000, tqr2813d376cjozqap1l@tutanota.com said:
> > It seems most people colloquially use DDoS for both, and reserve DoS for
> > magic-packet blocking exploits like the latest BIND CVE, FYI.
> Then they are mistaken, unfortunately.
Feel free to try to reclaim the old meaning of the word "hacker" while
you're at it. That ship sailed long ago, and so has the DoS/DDoS distinction.
--==_Exmh_1438575623_2094P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iQIVAwUBVb7sBwdmEQWDXROgAQJw4xAAorlhjP1f5PJVhApmgbabrJY5kYEb9Mci
NbZuY24DcTNABCm37PgQJ/QAvtQBaxvOa6Z6ly9NCI1xeObRXJrOet3qxIJiT1AG
6ng+YOG9WmlXFWNom9+0wpUgDjpjRKlwmDD46W2Kye2qdIF5NFCmNeVYg3qGV6Yl
22Ul8Wo7zjjPyLThMhmC6+zGNJdQ7eP6mvU9kvIG0j4tI0Z3r++LHN8f02q9EmSg
I7YwuJ9ghnaNqUUhotj0qnMQnwTp1RDE4YTdpayhMCAvt7asgg2gvuGbD4CejC9H
iFlbSq/TJZ+fAAEPc234qt6qQVM2KcQ54w4PwU6yMCnk9I/DMwfGz9u1IfiEfYJK
H9Fo8fqOX4LVIGoLTMTPFU2ODBAqmUkr7PH8bmhYKejmle1scYxBnheL7BR2QJFP
ej4FjrgstpV5zwTJWepHPm0bt7Wg5PLJpLuNlPX1Tu6TBnOZm8FO3db12+BnFRXg
TK46/cDgsTx2592Nvs3CG3c5CuT9cCiVj/t2L+qZvfFtIRd6DdpzFueeXKDxvIDt
MLXzDTnwxq0oDgsc8WOu8kMVXZwcf4jvIAwtBWc4RkT0mGBBMNsT+8/oglmiBhAt
Vhb+DYMzITZFzHIrsaDNRX9bwgsGCwaUU+o0SVUzDXY4Ln482g2B2/ZQxHnH2ygM
rokr5U3rAzc=
=X+jX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1438575623_2094P--
