[182857] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Dovid Bender)
Mon Aug 3 09:00:34 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <131048.1438575623@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, "NANOG" <nanog-bounces@nanog.org>,
tqr2813d376cjozqap1l@tutanota.com
From: "Dovid Bender" <dovid@telecurve.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 12:59:42 +0000
Reply-To: dovid@telecurve.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
Children!
Regards,
Dovid
-----Original Message-----
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Sender: "NANOG" <nanog-bounces@nanog.org>Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 00:20:23
To: <tqr2813d376cjozqap1l@tutanota.com>
Cc: <nanog@nanog.org>
Subject: Re: GoDaddy : DDoS :: Contact
On Mon, 03 Aug 2015 03:58:31 -0000, tqr2813d376cjozqap1l@tutanota.com said:
> > It seems most people colloquially use DDoS for both, and reserve DoS for
> > magic-packet blocking exploits like the latest BIND CVE, FYI.
> Then they are mistaken, unfortunately.
Feel free to try to reclaim the old meaning of the word "hacker" while
you're at it. That ship sailed long ago, and so has the DoS/DDoS distinction.
