[181689] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: NTT->HE earlier today (~10am EDT)

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Job Snijders)
Tue Jun 30 20:46:37 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 02:44:29 +0200
From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m26164u31p.wl%randy@psg.com>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

On Wed, Jul 01, 2015 at 09:36:34AM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
> >     - when not using the RTR protocol but generating prefix-list
> >       filters based on RPKI data, the devices might not support
> >       sufficient entries.
> 
> because the rpki generated acls are bigger and heavier than those in
> the irr.  and they have trans-fats.

I don't consider RPKI generated ACLs a 1 to 1 replacement for IRR based
filters. They might be used as supplement to each other. 

Kind regards,

Job

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post