[181686] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NTT->HE earlier today (~10am EDT)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Tue Jun 30 20:36:39 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 09:36:34 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
In-Reply-To: <20150630223319.GH95870@Vurt.local>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
> - equipment might not support the RTR protocol to validate
> announcements against the cache validator
alcalu, cisco, juniper do
> - Legal obstacles in obtaining the anchors from all RIRs
arin has been pwned by the tea party and is best ignored. that they do
not protect their members is their choice. they're a bottom up policy
organization, right. bottom of the barrel.
> - when not using the RTR protocol but generating prefix-list
> filters based on RPKI data, the devices might not support
> sufficient entries.
because the rpki generated acls are bigger and heavier than those in the
irr. and they have trans-fats.
> I'll count "not using brocade" as a valid method.
you use brocade at your border? how's that working out for you? :)
randy