[181690] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NTT->HE earlier today (~10am EDT)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Randy Bush)
Tue Jun 30 20:53:48 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2015 09:51:46 +0900
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
In-Reply-To: <20150701004429.GM95870@Vurt.local>
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces+nanog.discuss=bloom-picayune.mit.edu@nanog.org
>>> - when not using the RTR protocol but generating prefix-list
>>> filters based on RPKI data, the devices might not support
>>> sufficient entries.
>>
>> because the rpki generated acls are bigger and heavier than those in
>> the irr. and they have trans-fats.
>
> I don't consider RPKI generated ACLs a 1 to 1 replacement for IRR based
> filters. They might be used as supplement to each other.
the major user puts the rpki-generated pseudo-irr in front of the others
in peval(0) order. same number of resulting acls. hence i do not
understand your "the devices might not support sufficient entries."
randy
