[178651] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (joel jaeggli)
Sun Mar 1 21:14:23 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2015 18:14:01 -0800
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
To: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>, Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
In-Reply-To: <CC5D0883-99E8-4EAF-89B6-B0D32C23E90B@delong.com>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--ncrcwRDauXuUHjKdS2Dn4m8PGWMGhn0p2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 3/1/15 1:26 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>> It was the combination of asymmetric, no or few IPs (and NAT), and
>>> bandwidth caps.
>>
>> let's not rewrite history here: IPv4 address scarcity has been a thing=

>> since the very early 1990s.  Otherwise why would cidr have been create=
d?
>=20
> CIDR had nothing to do with address scarcity. CIDR was invented for rou=
ting
> table slot scarcity in Cisco AGS hardware of the era.

nope sorry, both are justifications...

https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1519#page-6

There are not according to 1993 era RFC's, enough class B and A networks
to go around...

(there still aren't)

We were around then and we got the patch.

> Routers running out of BGP table space wasn=92t just a fear at the time=
, it was
> a real problem on a number of networks, including, but not limited to S=
PRINT
> and MCI who were the big dogs in the fight at the time.

your cisco ags+ wasn't going to make it over the hump.

> NAT, OTOH, is an address conservation mechanism which has unfortunately=

> of late been mistaken for a security tool. If only people would realize=
 how much
> NAT negatively impacts security, manageability, etc.
>=20
> Owen
>=20
>=20



--ncrcwRDauXuUHjKdS2Dn4m8PGWMGhn0p2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAlTzx2oACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrJ+/gCcDyiqCqaZgVcWWbZY/FKFo8P3
yvMAn3sT6fDZG+E4e4maZ9dQ6uWXN5Fc
=/yV5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ncrcwRDauXuUHjKdS2Dn4m8PGWMGhn0p2--

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post