[178650] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: content regulation, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Owen DeLong)
Sun Mar 1 21:06:17 2015

X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
From: Owen DeLong <owen@delong.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.11.1503012056570.29307@ary.lan>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2015 18:01:19 -0800
To: "John R. Levine" <johnl@iecc.com>
Cc: nanog list <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org


> On Mar 1, 2015, at 17:58 , John R. Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:
>=20
>>> As I said above, retail customers.  Business customers get static =
IPs and generaly no blocking.
>=20
>> Business customers only get static from Comcast if they pay extra for =
it.
>=20
> I'm in a T-W area, haven't checked Comcast's prices lately.  But if =
you don't have a static IP, it's a poor idea to try to send mail =
directly since you're sharing your IP range with the usual array of =
botted Windows boxes and hacked Wordpress servers, so recipients are =
unlikely to accept it.
>=20
> R's,
> John

I don=E2=80=99t disagree. I use static IPs, I just don=E2=80=99t get =
them from Comcast. I use Comcast as an L2 substrate for my GRE tunnels =
where I run BGP with my real providers.

Owen


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post