[178676] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: content regulation, was Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Lamar Owen)
Mon Mar 2 11:40:37 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 11:40:32 -0500
From: Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu>
To: "nanog@nanog.org" <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAAAwwbX_CyrP3dPZ4HCNe85oGK8oRLrh=Rh=_gJzkbt7-_LORg@mail.gmail.com>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On 02/28/2015 07:33 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 8:34 AM, John R. Levine <johnl@iecc.com> wrote:=
> [...]
>> Until yesterday, there were no network neutrality rules, not for spam o=
r for
>> anything else.
> There still aren't any network neutrality rules, until the FCC makes
> the documents public, which they haven't yet.
>
The rules themselves are public. The area of uncertainty is whether the=20
Report and Order will pull in more rules than just the newly published=20
47CFR=A78. For instance, there's 47CFR=A76 which deal with=20
'telecommunications' carriers and the ADA.
But as far as net neutrality is concerned, the actual rules dealing with=20
the gist of it are embodied in 47CFR=A78 "Preserving the Open Internet." =20
Link to the eCFR page on it was posted elsewhere on the list.
