[177673] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IPv6 allocation plan, security, and 6-to-4 conversion
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (William Herrin)
Fri Jan 30 12:40:08 2015
X-Original-To: nanog@nanog.org
X-Really-To: <nanog@nanog.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150130174453.485e9105@envy.fud.no>
From: William Herrin <bill@herrin.us>
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:39:33 -0500
To: Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no>
Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org>
Errors-To: nanog-bounces@nanog.org
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Tore Anderson <tore@fud.no> wrote:
> * William Herrin
>
>> Plan on dual-stacking any network which requires
>> access to IPv4 resources such as the public Internet.
>
> For many folks, that's easier said than done.
>
> Think about it: If everyone could just dual-stack their networks, they
> might as well single-stack them on IPv4 instead; there would be no
> point whatsoever in transitioning to IPv6 for anyone.
Hi Tore,
That's what NAT is for. Use RFC 1918 space for end users, RFC 6598
space for ISPs.
Plan on dual-stacking until IPv6 deployment is ubiquitous. Which won't
be this year. Or next.
Regards,
Bill Herrin
--
William Herrin ................ herrin@dirtside.com bill@herrin.us
Owner, Dirtside Systems ......... Web: <http://www.dirtside.com/>
